Showing posts with label chinese corporate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chinese corporate. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

CLSC Ascend Deloitte Asia Pacific Networking Event, May 13, 2010, Wilton, CT

Thank you to the Ascend, Fairfield County branch, for an enlightening presentation on global economic trends yesterday, April 20, at HSBC’s offices in Westport, CT. More than 70 Asian Pacific finance professionals from throughout the area attend. We hope to see you at the next event.

CLSC and Ascend, the Pan-Asian leadership organization for finance professionals, would like to invite you to the following free networking event, presented by Deloitte, in Wilton, on May 13.

For information and to RSVP, please see below.

Presented by Deloitte WIN/Diversity Council and the Connecticut Chapter of ASCEND http://www.ascendleadership.org

Making the Numbers Memorable
Presented by Ellen Cahill,
senior consultant for the Ayers Group

As featured on NBC "Today", CNN-FN, "The Wall Street Journal" on-line, and at
various professional organizations and corporations

Thursday, May 13th, 5:30PM - 7:30PM


Can you deliver spoken messages that your listeners can remember and use in their business decisions? Can you make detailed financial data memorable and actionable?

Whatever your position, you know you need a variety of sophisticated spoken
communication skills. Polish and refresh your presentation skills and learn
practical techniques that can be rapidly assimilated to improve your delivery style
and content!


* Date and Time: Thursday, May 13th from 5:30pm to 7:30pm
Presentation will be followed by light cocktail reception and networking

* Location: Deloitte's Office at 10 Westport Road, Wilton, CT

* Dress Code: Business Casual


Register:
https://www.SignUp4.net/Public/ap.aspx?EID=20101207E

Or RSVP to:
connecticut@ascendleadership.org

Confirmation and directions will be sent a week before the event.

If you have any questions, please contact -
1. Pedro Lay, Deloitte @ 609-933-8885
2. Ashok Shenoy, RBS @ 203-570-7366

We look forward to seeing you at the event!

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

From the WSJ: What's in a Name: If It's 'China,' a Pick-Me-Up

If a broker says "China," do you hear "ka-ching"?

Dozens of tiny companies have gotten big stock-market boosts simply by adding the word "China" to their names. While the total dollars at stake are small, the trend is reminiscent of the Internet bubble's heyday, when a company could launch its stock price to the moon merely by tacking ".com" onto its official name.

Intelligent Investor: The Name Trap
3:48
Columnist Jason Zweig talks with Kelsey Hubbard about the significant influence that a name can have on attracting investors.
.It is also a reminder that for all too many people, investing remains like a word-association game. Stockpicking is often driven by resemblance instead of reality; a catchy name or vivid image can fill investors' heads with dreams of a bright future that mightn't be supported by the facts.

I asked Wei Wang, a finance professor at Queen's School of Business in Kingston, Ontario, to study the returns of the 82 companies that have adopted new names containing the word "China" since late 2006. The list includes 18 last year and four so far in 2010.

Prof. Wang looked at returns from 20 trading days before the announcement through 20 days after. He found that the average stock that added "China" to its name outperformed the overall market by 31 percentage points over that period. The results held up over shorter and longer periods and after Prof. Wang removed the most extreme cases.

Golden Green Enterprises Ltd., a steel producer, became China Gerui Advanced Materials Group Ltd. on Dec. 14. Over the 40 days surrounding the switch, the shares went from $5.01 to $6.88 on the Nasdaq Global Market, a 37% gain even as U.S. and Chinese stocks were generally flat.


Heath Hinegardner
.Edward Meng, China Gerui's chief financial officer, says the name switch was meant to reflect the company's "core competency, product-offering orientation and its association with Chinese companies listed in the U.S. markets." He adds: "We did get feedback from investors that they liked the new name. But it's hard to tell if the name change impacted the share-price movement."

Many China-syndrome stocks are created in reverse mergers with "shell companies." In this maneuver, a firm with a thinly traded stock, and often without viable operations, absorbs a more-marketable business whose shares mightn't have traded at all. The company is then renamed.

Consider Apogee Robotics, a company with no revenues or assets. It merged into a firm called Advanced Swine Genetics last Sept. 30, immediately renaming itself China Swine Genetics Inc.

The company didn't announce the name change until Oct. 13, however. The next day, the stock went from $8.40 to $15.60, an 86% gain. Then it collapsed. Last week, a mere 100 shares changed hands at $4.50 on the OTC Bulletin Board.

More Weekend Investor
Is It Safe to Buy Europe?
Running With Scissors: When Stock Duos Outperform Solos
Is Online Checking Worth the Hassle?
Family Value: Giving More to Both Kids and Charities
A Key Volatility Index That Says 'Buy' May Mean 'Bail'
.Executives at China Swine, which is based in Honolulu, didn't respond to requests for comment.

The rechristened "China" companies have a total market value of only about $8 billion. Most are unlisted on a major exchange, typically trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, where brokerage costs can be high. On China Swine, the "spread" between buy and sell prices (part of the cost to trade) exceeded a piggish 40% last week.

This is far from the first time that investors have fallen under the spell of greed-by-association.

In the early 1960s, many small stocks grabbed the market's attention with names evoking the promise of the Space Age, like G-W Ameritronics (a seller of truck bodies) and Techni Electronics (a maker of massage equipment). Many of the "tronics" companies went on to lose more than 90% of their value.

In 1999, Internet-obsessed traders drove Computer Literacy Inc. up by 33% in a day on word that the stock's name would change to fatbrain.com. In 1998 and 1999, the average company that added ".com" to its name outperformed other technology stocks by an average of 53 percentage points. Scads of them later went to zero.

Between 2004 and 2007, as the price of crude oil soared, companies in the U.S. and Canada that added the words "Oil" or "Petroleum" to their names got an instantaneous 8% boost to stock performance. Then they faded.

The bottom line: In the long run, cute names don't make money; only good businesses do.

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Shanghai World Expo: The New World's Fair

Interesting WSJ article on the World Expo, opening May 1 in Shanghai.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704869304575109563322843670.html

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Why Newly-Minted MBAs are Heading East

Why MBAs are Going East
Unprecedented growth, good salaries, and the ability to make an impact faster make Asia the new promised land for B-school grads
Crawford hopes he can capitalize on his Columbia MBA in Shanghai Rodney Evans

By Michelle Conlin

James Tsai is the sort of MBA corporate recruiters covet. He went to a good prep school, earned a degree with honors from Middlebury College, and made vice-president in Bank of America's (BAC) international wealth management group at the age of 26. Today, Tsai is about to graduate, straight A's in hand, from Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management, a top-rated program in America. And he's hustling to land his first post-MBA job—in China.

Executive Class strivers like Tsai used to have just one post-grad career destination, the U.S. Not anymore. "I am doing everything I think I can to get over there," he says.

Every era has its version of the MBA dream. In the 1980s, it was about conquering Wall Street and choppering off to the Hamptons. The late 1990s saw a stampede to Silicon Valley. In the mid-aughts, the gilded, clubby preserve of private equity beckoned. Now, the emerging narrative is about steroidal Asia and its promise of growth. At premiere institutions such as the University of Chicago's Booth School, the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, and Northwestern's Kellogg, the percentage of MBAs taking jobs in Asia—including U.S. students like Tsai as well as international students—has more than doubled in the past five years, from roughly 5% of the graduating class to more than 10%. "There is a sense that the center of gravity is shifting," says Julie Morton, Booth's associate dean for career services.

The number of students taking international jobs usually swells in a recession, says Kellogg Assistant Dean Roxanne Hori. But Hori and others believe that the refrain of "Go East, Young Man" is not a short-term response to the U.S. economic downturn but a structural shift toward an internationalized, mobile talent market. And right now, Asia is where the career velocity and opportunity are. "This has never really happened before, except in little spurts, where you have a fairly large group of talented, recent MBAs asking for assignments in China, Vietnam, India," says Jeff Joerres, CEO of global staffing firm Manpower. Adds Richard Florida, professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management: "I don't think many of us thought Asia would become the destination for top Western talent—but it is."

ONE WORD OF ADVICE
For many MBAs, the prospect of making a bigger impact faster is simply too good to pass up, especially now that the pay packages offered by both domestic and multinational companies are competitive with those in the U.S. Shortly before James Crawford, 30, headed to Columbia B-School two years ago, his dad sat him down in the kitchen of the family's suburban Chicago home. Think of that scene in The Graduate, only instead of saying "plastics," Crawford's father's advice was "Asia." Today, Crawford is pursuing multiple opportunities there. "I can't imagine a career over the next 30 years that would not require or give benefit to international experience," he says. Asia fever has also hit Wharton student Andrew Maywah, 32, who had a cushy life working at Oracle (ORCL) in Silicon Valley before graduate school. Now he is juggling offers from three Chinese companies. "It's like the Wild, Wild West. There is just so much happening there," he says. "I want to be at the center of it."

So do many Chinese who emigrated to the U.S. when they were young. They find themselves breaking the news to their families that they're chasing the same dream that lured their parents to the U.S., only in reverse. (What better time to leverage the family capital back in the old country?) The Chinese call these returnees hai gui, or sea turtles, referring to how these animals always return to their birthplace to lay their own eggs. Then there are the international students, who until recently would likely have stayed in the U.S. to learn the soft skills of Western management, and now are heading straight back home.

Piyush Singhvi, 27, was born in India, grew up in the Middle East, and, before Wharton, worked at the Dubai-based private equity firm Abraaj Capital, the largest non-state-owned firm in the region. When Singhvi enrolled in Wharton in 2008 he was certain, he says, that he would stay in the U.S. after graduation like most of his peers. But then came the financial crisis. "It was amazing to see how many people came in with the idea that they would stay in the West, and how that's drastically changed to just the opposite," he says. "There are a lot more opportunities in the East."

On Facebook, Twitter, and Skype, MBAs swap stories about the adrenaline rush of working in an emerging market and the joys of geographic arbitrage. After graduating from Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, Quan Trinh, 27, who grew up in Virginia, took a job with Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) in Shanghai. There she partakes of an upper-crust-Manhattan-type lifestyle—food delivered to her door every night, a maid who picks up after her, a balcony apartment in a compound with a pool—at Albany (N.Y.) prices. Add to the mix that she travels around Asia with top J&J execs, working in the strategic planning division for the company's diabetes business, and, she says, "sometimes I have to pinch myself."

STANDING ROOM ONLY
Asian companies used to rarely, if ever, come to American B-school campuses for recruiting season. Now at Wharton, Chinese firms like heavyweight investment bank China Investment Corp. and IT firm Tencent are showing up, says Wharton global careers director Sam Jones. This year, CICC played to standing-room-only crowds. At Kellogg, India-based Infosys (INFY) and Tata Group are now on hand for recruiting. The University of Chicago's Booth School is seeing so much interest from Chinese companies that it recently opened a career services office in Hong Kong.

South Korea's Samsung Electronics has been on a hiring tear. Last year the company signed 50 non-Korean MBAs from the top 10 business schools in the U.S., double the number of 2008, says Samsung Vice-President Kim Keun Bae. Those 50 were in addition to the dozens of ethnic Koreans that Samsung scooped up from MBA programs in America. At Kellogg, the company hired 16 business school graduates alone—more than U.S.-based hiring stalwarts General Mills (GIS) and Procter & Gamble (PG) combined. The new hires work in Samsung's Global Strategy Group, which does all of its business in English, advising top Samsung executives on internal consulting projects. This year the company is on track to again double its hiring of U.S.-born MBAs. "The young and smart from top U.S. business schools have helped provide fresh perspectives to our company," says Kim. "Both foreign recruits and Korean employees learn from each other, and that helps globalize the company."

In many cases, companies like Samsung are acing out their American rivals in hiring the very best candidates. Kellogg graduate Jonathan Scearcy, 28, had 30 job offers last year, most from top U.S. companies. But he turned them all down to take a job at Samsung so he could "get international exposure early," he says. "If you ever want to be at a C-suite, you have to have a global skill set and you have to have significant international exposure," says Scearcy.

"GROOMING GLOBAL CITIZENS"
Multinationals like Citibank (C), Pfizer (PFE), Eli Lilly (LLY), and Nike China are also broadening their international programs and amping up hiring for their Asia divisions. Last fall a phalanx of high-level IBM (IBM)ers hit premiere B-schools to talk up IBM's new five-year boot camp for its general manager program. The program gives the new hires massive international exposure, especially in places like Asia. "We are looking to attract global citizens," says Peggy Tayloe, IBM's recruiting director. Big Blue recently flew the recruits to its Armonk (N.Y.) headquarters, where they sipped cocktails and nibbled canapés in the inner sanctum of the company's plush C-suite. One of the new hires hobnobbing at the party was Harvard MBA Yashih Wu, who was born in California and graduated from Princeton University. Before B-school, she worked on Wall Street and Madison Avenue. But for her those places aren't the career destinations they used to be. Today, she says, "It's impossible not to think globally about one's career."

How much longer can the Asian allure hold? With protectionist talk rising in America, and China trying to put the brakes on its rapidly growing economy, there's always a chance that Asia could stumble. There's also rising concern about what the migration East might mean for the U.S.'s competitive edge. "I can't get out of my head that two-thirds of Silicon Valley companies were started by non-U.S. citizens," says Manpower CEO Joerres. What if, after Stanford University, Google (GOOG) co-founder Sergey Brin had returned to his birth country of Russia? What if James Tsai is about to do the Next Big Thing—but in his dad's old country in Beijing? "The best and the brightest are leaving," says the Rotman School's Florida. "As a country, the U.S. has never confronted this before."

Saturday, November 21, 2009

From Barrons: What if the World is Easternized, not Westernized?

From Barrons, November 23, 2009, also available at: http://online.barrons.com/article/SB125875982246358189.html


IT COULD BE MONTHS OR YEARS UNTIL we understand the impression that President Barack Obama made on the Chinese leadership last week. It took about two months to discover that Nikita Khrushchev had nothing but contempt for President John F. Kennedy after their 1961 meeting in Vienna. The almost immediate result of the Soviet leader's exercise in character assessment was the erection of the Berlin Wall. The Cuban missile crisis followed the next year.

Khrushchev concluded -- we know now from memoirs and archives -- that Kennedy was "too intelligent and too weak." When Khrushchev instructed his East German puppets to start building the wall, Kennedy made only token protest. Intelligently, he told associates that "a wall is a hell of a lot better than a war." But the next year he faced a bigger challenge -- Soviet ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads, based in Cuba -- and he met that threat without weakness, by facing down the threat of war.

In the end, it was Khrushchev, not Kennedy, who was too weak. In Cuba, if not in Berlin, his reach exceeded his military grasp. Khrushchev based his policy too much on his assessment of his adversary's character.

Fortunately, after they looked over the brink of nuclear war in 1962, both sides were more determined to be sure that the Cold War stayed cold. There would be wars on the periphery, of which the biggest was in Vietnam, but no direct confrontations. Both sides were patient, waiting for the other to crumple from within.

Economic Engagement

China, thank the world's lucky stars, is not the Soviet Union. Its leaders, from Mao Zedong to Hu Jintao, seem to understand American weaknesses and strengths, both physical and moral, better than the Soviets did, and they are much more patient.

China has chosen economic engagement with the U.S., creating a symbiotic relationship that is several steps short of a partnership. In 2006, scholars Niall Ferguson and Moritz Schularick called it "Chimerica." They thought that the relationship, merging Chinese production and saving with American consumption and debt, accounted for as much as half of the world's economic growth in the 21st century. Between 2000 and 2008, China quintupled exports and quadrupled gross domestic product while the U.S. ran deficits of every kind. More recently, the Chimerican symbiosis has looked less inviting.

The financial crisis has pushed American politicians, economists and consumers into two camps. There are those who believe that America must not prosper too much in the next few years, choosing instead to save, invest and reinvigorate its productive economy. On the other side, which is currently in charge of most centers of power, are those who believe that America must borrow more, spend more and inflate its currency to rejustify its prices and devalue its debts.

There may be two camps on the Chinese side also, but it's hard to tell. Are there any Chinese who do not believe the U.S. intends to be the dominant partner in the Chimerican relationship? Are there any Chinese who do not laugh, at least inwardly, when they hear a U.S. official speak of America's "strong-dollar" policy? Are there any Chinese leaders who think that America and the dollar are their only options for financial partnership during the next two or three decades?

Did President Obama change any of those perceptions? Probably not.

New Investment Order

Generating a couple of trillion dollars a year in capital, China is seeking sounder investments than U.S. Treasuries -- investments that are more likely to contribute to its growth and security. China is shoveling billions of dollars into natural-resource extraction in Africa and Latin America, untroubled by scruples about the venal governments it deals with. It is negotiating regional free-trade treaties with other countries in Asia, even with Taiwan, which China considers a rebellious province that just happens to supply technology and capital for Chinese development.

The Chinese also mutter, more and more clearly, about their need -- and what they see as the world's need -- to be less dependent on the dollar. Although they continue to peg their currency to the dollar, in effect borrowing the advantages of the dollar's weakness to sell goods to the world, they also talk about new currencies and baskets of currencies to price the things they most want to buy, such as oil.

Apocalypse Soon

In a new book, columnist Martin Jacques of the British newspaper the Guardian blends all these trends and his close observation of Chinese culture. His title is his conclusion: When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order (Penguin Press).

Although we don't enjoy his obvious satisfaction with the idea that the end is at hand for the American and British Industrial Revolutions and all their consequences, Americans should take his vision seriously.

China has 25% of the world's labor force, at least half of which remain in poor rural areas. Its growth rate since 1978 has been 9.4%, compared with the 3.9% U.S. growth rate during its economic takeoff period from 1870 to 1913. China's GDP is likely to surpass the U.S. in the mid-2020s, if current trends continue.

Jacques tells us that the West, and America, may cease to be the center of the world's affairs, and that will have interesting consequences: "The dominant Western view is that globalization is a process by which the rest of the world becomes -- and should become -- increasingly Westernized, with the adoption of free markets, the import of Western capital, privatization, the rule of law, human-rights regimes and democratic norms."

Jacques constantly asks what our part of the world will be like if China does not Westernize before it becomes the most important nation in the world.

The West, he says, "will be required to think of itself in relative rather than absolute terms, obliged to learn about, and to learn from, the rest of the world without the presumption of underlying superiority, the belief that ultimately it knows best and is the fount of civilizational wisdom."

China drinks from its own fount of superiority and civilizational wisdom. How is President Obama meeting its challenge?